❶ “保护环境比发展经济更重要”的英文辩论资料，多少都行。
China is a developing country, and in the socialist modernization drive in the process of economic development and environmental protection often conflict. We need to protect the environment of economic development.
First, we must protect the environment of economic development is the essential requirement of economic development. Economic development is to improve people's living standards. China's economic development is to solve the people's increasing material and cultural needs. Born Out of China's semi-colonial and semi-feudal agricultural country. Weak economic foundation, a low level of instrialization, in the course of economic development and economic development in the protection of the environment prevailing contradictions. Protection of the environment including the protection of people's living environment and the natural environment. Exist in the city economic development especially instrial development on the lives of the residents have a negative impact on the situation in the rural areas there is more damage the natural environment and ecological environment. The purpose of economic development is to improve people's living standards, and the process of development because of damage to the environment affect people's lives, and contrary to the original intent of economic development.
Second, we must protect the environment of economic development is the strategy of sustainable development requirements. The environment we live in, our future generations have to live here. We destroy the environment of economic development, some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime. Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development research, vigorously develop the green instry, and pollution-free instries. China is a civilization with a long history and a big country in the process of economic development should also attach importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a better living space.
Third, we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law requirements. The process of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished. Major floods caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result. In the floods in the consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the environment more than the fruits of economic development. The laws of nature is merciless, who violated it who will be its revenge. We must attach great importance to the process of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and social environment.
Fourth, economic development and resolve conflicts protection of the environment is the fundamental way to further economic development. Development is the last word. We can not lose the economic development and the protection of the environment, not because of the ground to protect the environment in the development of economic issues before the vine. Way is economic development. It is necessary to strengthen environmental awareness and use our brains. Economic development and environmental protection are not necessarily contradictory. On the contrary, economic development should promote environmental protection. Extensive multi-level high-technology development, instrial pollution-free green. The development of the economy, the prosperity of the country, the level of development of proctive forces, people conquering nature's ability to transform nature will be further strengthened. People not only have the ability to protect the environment, but also the environment can be rebuilt. Desert will be transformed into farmland. Economic development is the way to protect the environment.
Fifth, the whole society should attach importance to developing the economy and protecting the environment. At present many places, there are many sectors of the expense of the environment and developing the economy. This is historical and practical reasons, but look at the use of the development issue, people will be even more profound understanding of the economic development process of the importance of environmental protection, leaders at all levels should establish environmental awareness, from the strategic height of the development of knowledge economy and the protection of the environment , based on the overall situation into consideration in the protection of the environment at the same time vigorously developing the economy and improving the people's standard of living.
In short, protecting the environment and economic development are not contradictory. In the process of economic development must pay attention to protecting the environment.
Because pollution will, of course, cause harm. Earth is a circle of the world. In fact, there is no absolute on the planet waste. All things can be recycled. But human intervention so that the deviation in this cycle, there has been not the cycle of things. For example, the styrofoam boxes years ago. If this is the case, then, is a vicious circle. That the Earth's resources will be consumed End. Well, the earth dangerous. Protective measures should be as close to the Earth's self-cycle. Prevention should do more "farsightedness" and not always stare in the economic goals. Should be from the perspective of the humanities and natural starting
译文：我国是发展中国家，在社会主义现代化建设过程中发展经济与保护环境时常发生冲突。我们发展经济必须保护环境。
一、发展经济必须保护环境是发展经济的本质要求。发展经济是为了提高人民的生活水平。在我国发展经济是为了解决人民日益增长的物质文化需求。我国脱胎于半殖民地、半封建的农业国。经济基础薄弱，工业化程度低，在经济发展过程中发展经济与保护环境的矛盾普遍存在。保护环境包括保护人民群众生活环境和自然环境。在城市存在发展经济尤其是发展工业对居民生活产生不良影响的情况，在农村更是存在破坏自然环境和生态环境的问题。发展经济的目的是为了提高人民生活水平，而发展过程中因破坏环境影响人民生活，违背了发展经济的本意。
二、发展经济必须保护环境是可持续发展战略的要求。我们生活的环境，我们的子孙后代也要在这里生活。我们发展经济破坏了环境，有些破坏是无法弥补的，是对子孙后代的犯罪。现在世界各国都已高度重视可持续发展战略的研究，大力发展绿色工业，无公害产业。我国是具有悠久历史和文明的大国，在发展经济过程中更应该重视环境保护，为子孙后代留下美好的生活空间。
三、发展经济必须保护环境是自然规律的要求。经济发展过程中，如果自然环境受到了严重损害，那么我们将受到自然的严厉惩罚。重大的洪涝灾害都是破坏环境造成的必然结果。在抗洪救灾中消耗的人力、物力、财务恐怕已超过了牺牲环境的经济发展成果。自然规律是无情的，谁侵犯了它谁将受到它的报复。我们必须高度重视发展经济过程中保护自然环境和社会环境。
四、解决发展经济与保护环境矛盾的根本出路在于进一步发展经济。发展是硬道理。我们不能因为发展经济而失去对环境的保护，更不能因为以保护环境为由在发展经济问题上畏缩不前。出路还在于发展经济。要加强环境保护意识，开动脑筋。发展经济与保护环境并不是必然矛盾。相反，发展经济应该促进环境保护。广泛多发展科技水平高，无公害的绿色工业。经济发展了，国家富强了，生产力发展水平提高了，人们征服自然改造自然的能力会进一步得到加强。人们不但有能力保护环境，还可以改造环境。将沙漠改造成良田。发展经济是保护环境的出路。
五、全社会都应该重视发展经济与保护环境的问题。目前许多地方、许多部门都存在着牺牲环境而发展经济的情况。这有历史和现实原因，但用发展的眼光看问题，人们会更加深刻认识发展经济过程中保护环境的重要性，各级领导都应该树立环保意识，从战略的高度认识发展经济与保护环境的问题，立足全局，统筹兼顾，在保护好环境的同时大力发展经济，提高人民的生活水平。
总之，保护环境与发展经济是不矛盾的。发展经济过程中必须注意保护环境。
因为污染当然会造成危害。地球是一个循环的世界。其实，在地球上没有绝对的废弃物。所有的东西都可以循环利用。但是人类的介入，使这个循环出现了偏差，出现了不能循环的东西。比如早些年的发泡饭盒。如果这样的话，那么，就是一个恶性循环。这样地球的资源就会被消耗完。那么，地球就危险了。保护的措施应该是尽量的接近地球的自我循环。预防应该是多做些“远视”，不要老是盯在经济目标上。
❷ 英语辩论一辩陈词经济发展比保护环境更重要
二反击辩词：
反击辩词：
问：当一个人分文没有之时，是先解决吃穿问题，还是饿着肚子去植树造林呢？？？（或其他钱的问题，如发放资金等等。）
驳：对方辩友方才提到了分文没有——也就是指钱的问题，我想提醒对方辩友，经济发展并不等同于钱的多少，经济二字也并不单单的等同于钱。如果对方辩友一定要强调钱也是经济的一部分，那么我不妨用钱举一个例子。我们上山游玩，经常会看到一块牌子上写着：护林防火，人人有责，吸烟者罚款50元。这说明了什么？不是正是说明了，谁不保护环境，谁就要付出经济的代价么！试问，环境与经济，谁更重要！如果真的经济发展重要，为什么国家不反过来规定：谁盗窃了50元，就罚谁入林带烟，放火烧山！
问：当一个人衣食住行都无法解决之时，如何能去保护环境。
驳：对方辩友说在此时衣食住行如此重要，难道是认为衣食住行代表着经济么？错了，它恰恰代表着环境。我要告诉对方辩友，衣食住行也好，柴米油盐酱醋茶也好，这些都是从我们地球的环境中来的。他们的材料都属于地球环境，而不是天外飞来的，太空中落下来的。我相信在座各位谁都不是吃冥王星的大米穿北极星的衣服长大的吧。现在就对方辩友刚才的问题，我想反问，当地球的环境资源消耗没了，我们吃穿的材料都没有了，衣食住行都无法解决了，又如何发展经济？
问：如果一个国家经济发展极弱，人民生活在吃不饱穿不暖的苦境中，我们怎么能逼迫人家去植树造林，保护环境，这不是太残忍了吗？
驳：我们今天的论题是经济发展与环境保护谁更重要，而不是谁重要，谁干脆就不重要。为什么对方辩友这么喜欢用如此极端的例子来冠以欲加之罪呢？如果对方辩友非要问在一个毫无经济基础的地方保护环境可行与否。那么我方是否也可以问假设在一个毫无环境基础可言的哈雷彗星上发展经济可行与否呢？
问：非洲现在沙漠化很严重，但你和它们讲，我快饿死啦，但我先要种草，像话吗？
驳：如果没有美国人，没有欧洲人跑去那边为了经济乱开发，你觉得非洲人真的要面临今天这样的窘境吗？
问：对方辩友一直说要环境保护，可环境保护是什么呢？难道是举着牌子写上环境保护吗？难道环境保护不需要实际行动吗？实际的行动不需要物质的支持吗? 在保护环境的过程中，不需要投入人力财力物力吗？如果没有经济的发展，又如何又能力去环境保护呢？
驳：可对方辩友，经济发展了，人不一定去拯救地球。国家可能会拿来进行综合建设，企业进行扩大在生产，人们可能跑去看电影，回去买奢侈品。对方辩友，如果不把环境保护放在优先，你怎么知道地球还有救呢？
因为经济发展了，美国（或其他某国）才能每年拿出24.7亿元去改善环境，如果经济不发展美国能出得起这么多钱吗？
驳：美国（或其他某国）之所以要花那么多财力来解决环境问题，是因为它们在经济发展时候制造了太多问题啦！而且对方辩友的逻辑也非常有意思。大家不妨想想看，如果一个人每年要花10多万元去医院看病，那到底是说明了他有钱呢？还是他有病呢?（语气停顿1秒以上） 相比给她更多的钱去治病，那不得病，不更好么。
❸ 求经济发展比环境保护重要的观点的英语文章
esteemed debater:
We are discussing economic development and environmental protection which is more important?
Could I ask you a few questions?
I think you should know what makes the Loess [ˈləuis] Plateau [ˈplætəu] into a wasteland now
IT Largely e to the backward economic development, where people can not live a normal life, so they cut down trees to make money and fire
Under such circumstance we had turned a lush plateau into wasteland now
So could you tell me which is more important?
There are many such examples
We often say environment is important than economy?
However, if we do not develop the economy and what we use to carry out environmental protection?
We are all aware of the policy implementation of environmental protection requires a large amount of funds
IN other words,,develop economic well ---- we can provide technical support for environmental protection and material support
上面这个适用于二辩
My esteemed debaters:
After discussion, we still insist on our points of view.
Now I will summary our opinions.
We think that economic development is still more significant than environmental protection from the following aspects.
Primarily, Economical development and environmental protection are not necessarily contradictory. On the contrary, economic development can provide technically and materially support to environmental protection.
BUT backward economy
will only have adverse impact to environmental protection. Therefore, we must consider economic development as a prerequisite.
Additionally, if we overlook economic development, environmental protection will be an idle talk. As we all know, the policy implementation of environmental protection requires a large amount of funds. The development of the economy, the prosperity of the country, will strengthen people’s capacity to transform or rebuilt the environment.
So Economic development is the way to protect the environment
To sum up, we consider that economical development is significant.
这个适用于三辩，我们刚辩论完
❹ 英语辩论 在中国经济发展和环境保护哪个应优先
你是财大的
其实在这个辩论中最主要的是找FACT就可以了
比如新型混合动力汽车使用、温室效应等等
自己弄
❺ 英语辩论会，关于环境与经济发展
这个是重视经济发展的
My esteemed debater:
We are discussing economic development and environmental protection which is more important?
Could I ask you a few questions?
I think you should know what makes the Loess [ˈləuis] Plateau [ˈplætəu] into a wasteland now
IT Largely e to the backward economic development, where people can not live a normal life, so they cut down trees to make money and fire
Under such circumstance we had turned a lush plateau into wasteland now
So could you tell me which is more important?
There are many such examples
We often say environment is important than economy?
However, if we do not develop the economy and what we use to carry out environmental protection?
We are all aware of the policy implementation of environmental protection requires a large amount of funds
IN other words,,develop economic well ---- we can provide technical support for environmental protection and material support
❻ 经济发展和环境保护哪个更重要辩论词，最好用英文版的
China is a developing country, and in the socialist modernization drive in the process of economic development and environmental protection often conflict. We need to protect the environment of economic development.
First, we must protect the environment of economic development is the essential requirement of economic development. Economic development is to improve people's living standards. China's economic development is to solve the people's increasing material and cultural needs. Born Out of China's semi-colonial and semi-feudal agricultural country. Weak economic foundation, a low level of instrialization, in the course of economic development and economic development in the protection of the environment prevailing contradictions. Protection of the environment including the protection of people's living environment and the natural environment. Exist in the city economic development especially instrial development on the lives of the residents have a negative impact on the situation in the rural areas there is more damage the natural environment and ecological environment. The purpose of economic development is to improve people's living standards, and the process of development because of damage to the environment affect people's lives, and contrary to the original intent of economic development.
Second, we must protect the environment of economic development is the strategy of sustainable development requirements. The environment we live in, our future generations have to live here. We destroy the environment of economic development, some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime. Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development research, vigorously develop the green instry, and pollution-free instries. China is a civilization with a long history and a big country in the process of economic development should also attach importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a better living space.
Third, we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law requirements. The process of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished. Major floods caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result. In the floods in the consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the environment more than the fruits of economic development. The laws of nature is merciless, who violated it who will be its revenge. We must attach great importance to the process of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and social environment.
Fourth, economic development and resolve conflicts protection of the environment is the fundamental way to further economic development. Development is the last word. We can not lose the economic development and the protection of the environment, not because of the ground to protect the environment in the development of economic issues before the vine. Way is economic development. It is necessary to strengthen environmental awareness and use our brains. Economic development and environmental protection are not necessarily contradictory. On the contrary, economic development should promote environmental protection. Extensive multi-level high-technology development, instrial pollution-free green. The development of the economy, the prosperity of the country, the level of development of proctive forces, people conquering nature's ability to transform nature will be further strengthened. People not only have the ability to protect the environment, but also the environment can be rebuilt. Desert will be transformed into farmland. Economic development is the way to protect the environment.
Fifth, the whole society should attach importance to developing the economy and protecting the environment. At present many places, there are many sectors of the expense of the environment and developing the economy. This is historical and practical reasons, but look at the use of the development issue, people will be even more profound understanding of the economic development process of the importance of environmental protection, leaders at all levels should establish environmental awareness, from the strategic height of the development of knowledge economy and the protection of the environment , based on the overall situation into consideration in the protection of the environment at the same time vigorously developing the economy and improving the people's standard of living.
In short, protecting the environment and economic development are not contradictory. In the process of economic development must pay attention to protecting the environment.
Because pollution will, of course, cause harm. Earth is a circle of the world. In fact, there is no absolute on the planet waste. All things can be recycled. But human intervention so that the deviation in this cycle, there has been not the cycle of things. For example, the styrofoam boxes years ago. If this is the case, then, is a vicious circle. That the Earth's resources will be consumed End. Well, the earth dangerous. Protective measures should be as close to the Earth's self-cycle. Prevention should do more "farsightedness" and not always stare in the economic goals. Should be from the perspective of the humanities and natural starting
❼ 英语辩论赛:经济增长与环境保护在中国哪个应该优先
英语辩论——环境保护 VS 经济发展(经济发展正方） Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth. 正 方 陈 词 ： Good morning everyone! We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s environment growth that should be chosen. I have three reasons to prove this point. First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy. Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection. We can develop our economy without environment pollution. Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win. In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China. 反方陈词：We agree economic growth is needed. But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence. What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much. By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position. At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment. So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past. That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. That’s all I want to say. 自由辩论 正方二辩：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live. Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies? 反方二辩：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present . Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high .But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. We have money, but being under the sub health condition. Does it make any sense, opponent debaters? 正方三辩：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people. The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China. We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research. They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy. I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength. 反 方 三 辩 ： Environmental protection needs economy . But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth. If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection. The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy. We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .But we should still take economic construction as the central task. 反方： admit economic construction is our country’s principle task .But we have to insist We on sustainable development while developing economy. We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development. 总结： 正方总结：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth” .I think what they said can’t come true at present . It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy. 反方总结: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises. As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration. Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy. If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it .But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust. The urgency like this can’t wait. So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you
❽ 英文辩论赛[关于“环境保护与经济发展哪个重要”]
1.政府拿了纳税人的钱，不干行吗？保护环境是政府基本职能之一，比个人有更充足的人力、物质、信息资源，可以通过等手段有效的保护环境，所以.. 2，环保的范围很广，先查一下，哪些主要靠政府的。比如，对生产厂家排污的管理，垃圾分类处理等。 论证的角度有以下： 1.个人有环保的意识也需要政府政策的支持。比如对环保行为给予精神或物质奖励。 2.政府要环保的公共设施建设好。 3.政府要用人力物力财力进行环保观念宣传，特别是从儿童教育开始。 日本英国等国家在公共场所都设置分类垃圾箱，分类垃圾箱上画了很清晰明确的图画，市民很容易把垃圾正确分类，而且从小灌输环保理念。如今中国人民的垃圾分类观念提高不少，但是真正做到垃圾分类的少之又少，就上海而言，小区垃圾箱是分类的，但是垃圾车收垃圾的时候将所有垃圾都倒在一起拉走，就算居民做到了垃圾分类也会最终被垃圾车混在一起，分类也白分，能回收的垃圾也被当作无法回收的垃圾被填埋，这就是政府的管理不到位导致的后果。 3.，个人观点： 问题是个人靠不靠得住。正是因为个人靠不住，所以才要有“政府”这个部门来统一管辖协调，反过来讲，要是个人靠得住，那还哪儿来的那么多问题。 政府的作用，就是将各利益群体的矛盾进行调和，最终达到环境与经济的可持续发展。 4，长期以来，我国的环保一直是政府主导型，并且这种趋势与日俱增。中华环保联合会等机构一项调查结果显示，97.5％的公众都赞成将环保指标纳入官员政绩考核体系；而中国环境文化促进会发布的我国首个公众环保指数显示，如果以百分制计算的话，2005年中国公众环保指数得分为68.05分。综合两组数据不难看出，公众对环保的关注度很高，但参与度不强。 谁都希望有一个良好的生存环境，“全民环保”抑或是达及这一目标最好的方式。如果说“搭便车”现象使得公众在环保自觉方面容易产生惰性的话，公民环境权行使与救济的缺陷，则又使这一惰性变成了“麻木症”。 其实，将环境权列为现代法治国家公民的基本权利，已经成为国际社会的普遍共识。面临日益严重的环境问题，固然需要公权力强势介入，亦需要更多地借助私权利。通过立法明确公民的环境权，并通过一系列制度安排，确保此项权利行使与救济的顺利实现，不仅为公权力的行使提供广泛的民意支持，更可依托广泛的私权利，无时不在、无处不在地监督和制约公权力的作为与不作为。如此多管齐下，环境问题的有效缓解将是可以期待的。 通过立法明确公民的环境权，标志着主管部门管理理念和管理方式的重大转变：由单一的部门行政管理，转向高调支持公众参与，切实赋予公民环境权，以形成主管部门、公众与NGO组织多方良性互动的格局。 这一格局的最终成型，不仅将为往昔稍显突兀和孤单的“环保风暴”提供强有力的支撑，更重要的是，环境保护问题有望迎来实质性的变革。 5，保护环境，首先要在观念上有意识。沱江污染事故发生后，四川省有关负责人反思道：这些污染现象表现在企业，但其根源还是在政府。企业之所以如此肆无忌惮，正是地方政府一味的追求经济发展，忽视环境保护工作的结果。如果政府注意保护环境，将成为环境保护的最大动力。 其次，保护环境还要有好的管理体制。中国在国家财政能力有限的情况下，充分发挥政府的主导作用，通过制定法律，完善政策，增强机构，加大执法力度，健全监测体系，改善技术能力和多方面筹资等多项措施，在保护环境方面取得了成效。政府对于环境保护的主导作用是中国实施可持续发展战略中总结出来的最重要启示。 再次，保护环境还需要科技强有力的支持。由于技术有限，群众发现环境受到污染在一定程度上要比政府落后。2005年11月13日，吉林省境内中石油吉化公司双苯厂胺苯车间发生爆炸，百吨苯类污染物流入松花江。环保部门次日即检测出水体苯超标，但是，松花江流域的群众在距污染发生10日以后才知道事件。 最后，立法 、执法也是保护环境的有力措施。《环境保护产品认定管理暂行办法》产生于计划经济时代，有些规定与WTO原则不符合。自我国加入WTO后，为适应入时的形势要求，国家环保总局对原《环境保护产品认定管理暂行办法》进行了修订。试问，这些群众能办到吗？ 6，之后才有人们的普遍环保意识的提升，所以说环境保护主要靠政府，或者说个人意识的上升是政府动作的良好结果，也是环境保护最终取得成功的一个可能阶段，但是如果把一个中间阶段当成对一件事情的主要决定因素就以点盖面，以偏概全了，所以说我们的观点是环境保护需要整个社会的共同努力才能最终取得良好的结果，但是环境保护主要是依靠政府！ 7，有意引导对方走入误区，力争让听众觉得他们的观点是“要依靠个人”而不是“依靠群众”，我们可以准备一些攻击个人英雄主义的论据和例子，会派上用场的；当然如果对方不中计，那么你们就从法律的强制性方面多谈谈吧。 8，历数中国乱砍乱伐事件，没有政府干预，没有出台相应的制度法律，那么这种现象将延续；（法律） 9，环境保护主要靠政府从三北防护林，到黄河的综合治理；从沙漠绿洲工程到汽车尾气排量的限制；处处都有政府手段在大显身手，政府手段就像一根无形的绳索，将分散在民众中的力量积聚起来，使其最大限度的发挥力量，政府手段不仅能够在治理方面占主要作用，还在保持环境方面有巨大作用。而民众意识呢，由于其先天不足，具有松散性，从古至今，公众意识不能形成足够大的约束力，退一万步来说，即使绝大多数的人都很自觉了，也能抑制少部分污染，却对主要污染源无能为力。环境保护是一项复杂的系统工程，涉及面广，只有政府能多方面地协调；其次，要坚持可持续性发展，就要经济与环保并行，就要解决吃饭和资金的问题，这只有政府能办到；再次，政府可以整合人力和财力资源，使其达到效益最优化；再次，环境保护需要全球化，全球化需要政府出面;最后,环境保护中政府的立法、监督具有更强的执行力。所以，我们坚信环境保护政府这一倚天长剑 10.，环保需要： 钱--要政府 人力---需要政府 制度---需要人大，还是政府 税收调控---需要制度，还是政府 宣传---费用，还是要政府 国际合作---要有组织，还是政府 11，群众是由个人组成，但个人不能代表群众，否则就是个人英雄主义 12，反方一辩则指出，环境问题的根本矛盾在于人口密集，群众环保意识差；而解决环境问题的根本方法在于群众积极参与到环保行动中来。反方举例，德国使用垃圾分类回收箱很成功，是因为德国群众的环保意识好；而中国使用垃圾分类回收箱效果不好，是因为群众环保意识差。反方还举出淮河治理的例子，说明群众的环保意识比政府拨款更重要。最后，反方归纳政府、群众二着在环保中的关系——政府起组织、监督的作用，只能治标，为外因；群众是行动主体，能治本，为内因。反方虽然注意了群众与政府的比较，但本身的立论框架过于简单。 在盘问、驳论环节，双方首先就反方在立论中举出的例子展开攻防，正方说德国、中国都使用分类垃圾箱却结果不同，是因为双方国情不同，这显然是政府的事情（这个推论有问题，但反方没有追究）。反方又举出生活垃圾、环保标志、环保教育等例子，而正方却一直在说，所有的环保行为缺少了政府的参与，都是不行的 13，火车跑的快，全凭车头带。环境保护，是指对自然环境实施的保护，自然环境是一个广义的概念，包括人类置身其中的整个环境。政府手段是指作为社会管理主导力量的政府采取的保护环境的一系列行为和措施。环境保护要得以有效的可持续的实现，主要靠政府手段。 14，第一，政府作为社会管理的主体，它有权利有义务对它管理的客体履行相关职责。自然环境是这个客体中的组成部分，政府对自然环境的保护责无旁贷。 第二，政府有能力对自然环境进行保护，而且政府保护手段发挥的作用是巨大而无可代替的第三，政府在舆论上可以发挥其杠杆作用，营造全社会都来进行环境保护的浓郁氛围。第四，只有政府手段才能实现环境保护的科学化，并形成可持续发展的局面
❾ “经济发展比环境保护更重要”的英文辩论稿，急求！
大姐，您吉大的吧